Skip to main content

Resolved Issues

View the resolved issues for a specific Platform release.

Go to download resolved issues by patch release.

Browse release notes for a selected Pega Version.

NOTE: Enter just the Case ID number (SR or INC) in order to find the associated Support Request.

Please note: beginning with the Pega Platform 8.7.4 Patch, the Resolved Issues have moved to the Support Center.

SR-133183 · Issue 205535

Fixed flow line distortion in Process Modeler

Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.9

When clicking through to a subprocess from a parent flow (by clicking the + sign in the blue subprocess shape), flow lines in the subprocess were shown in a distorted fashion. When opening the same flow in a separate tab (by right clicking the blue subprocess shape and selecting Open Flow) the flow lines were correctly painted. This was an issue caused by the different renderings of the flow depending on whether there was a click through to it (with the + on the parent flow?s subprocess shape), or the subflow was opened in a separate tab (with open Flow). After the Process Modeler saved and checked-in the flow, the connector lines were re-drawn in ways that were non-intuitive and hard to interpret due to the edge routing in PM being calculated off incorrect input data that was taking into account shapes that were not represented on the screen. To fix this, the system now ensures the edges are routed without taking into account any shapes not represented on the canvas.

SR-133184 · Issue 203710

Fixed flow line distortion in Process Modeler

Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.9

When clicking through to a subprocess from a parent flow (by clicking the + sign in the blue subprocess shape), flow lines in the subprocess were shown in a distorted fashion. When opening the same flow in a separate tab (by right clicking the blue subprocess shape and selecting Open Flow) the flow lines were correctly painted. This was an issue caused by the different renderings of the flow depending on whether there was a click through to it (with the + on the parent flow?s subprocess shape), or the subflow was opened in a separate tab (with open Flow). After the Process Modeler saved and checked-in the flow, the connector lines were re-drawn in ways that were non-intuitive and hard to interpret due to the edge routing in PM being calculated off incorrect input data that was taking into account shapes that were not represented on the screen. To fix this, the system now ensures the edges are routed without taking into account any shapes not represented on the canvas.

SR-A1705 · Issue 205449

Fixed scrumboard intermittent failure

Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.9

After upgrading, it was seen that the scrumboard would intermittently fail to load, partially displaying and then hanging if the columns did not fit within the window boundaries due to the number of elements. This was traced to an error in the functionality that resizes parts of the scrumboard, and has been fixed.

SR-A4995 · Issue 213355

Fixed flow line distortion in Process Modeler

Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.9

When clicking through to a subprocess from a parent flow (by clicking the + sign in the blue subprocess shape), flow lines in the subprocess were shown in a distorted fashion. When opening the same flow in a separate tab (by right clicking the blue subprocess shape and selecting Open Flow) the flow lines were correctly painted. This was an issue caused by the different renderings of the flow depending on whether there was a click through to it (with the + on the parent flow?s subprocess shape), or the subflow was opened in a separate tab (with open Flow). After the Process Modeler saved and checked-in the flow, the connector lines were re-drawn in ways that were non-intuitive and hard to interpret due to the edge routing in PM being calculated off incorrect input data that was taking into account shapes that were not represented on the screen. To fix this, the system now ensures the edges are routed without taking into account any shapes not represented on the canvas.

INC-126129 · Issue 569667

PropertyToColumnMap made more robust

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The DF_ProcessEmails dataflow was intermittently failing with a StageException error. This was traced to schema changes being propagated asynchronously by system pulse, which seem to have caused PropertyToColumnMap to cache stale schema. To resolve this, if the property mapping is not found the first time, the system will make a second attempt to get the mapping. Additional logging has also been added for better diagnostics.

INC-126319 · Issue 566343

Able to add offer to Change Request after deleting other offer from the landing page

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

A Change Request creation was failing after deleting an offer rule from the revision management landing page. While deleting the offer rule, the activity pyDeleteRuleFromLP is called and pxDeleteRecord API is used to delete the rule. The pyWorkPage is being modified with class Work-ProjectManagement-CheckIn when the pxDeleteRecord activity is executed, but after this, the Change Request creation failed due to the wrong context of the pyWorkPage. This has been resolved by adding Page-New of pyWorkPage conditionally.

INC-126801 · Issue 576324

Improved cleanup for adm_response_meta_info

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The adm_commitlog.adm_response_meta_info column family was growing, leading to gradual increase in CPU utilization on the ADM nodes over time. Investigation showed that the compaction on the adm_response_meta_info table was not being triggered by the ADM service, and the compaction did not remove rows that belonged to models that had been deleted. To resolve this, compaction of the adm_response_meta_info table has been moved from the ADM client nodes to the ADM service nodes, which will correctly trigger the compaction on a predefined schedule. The compaction logic has also been refactored to remove rows that belong to models that have been deleted.

INC-128342 · Issue 594184

Improved cleanup for adm_response_meta_info

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The adm_commitlog.adm_response_meta_info column family was growing, leading to gradual increase in CPU utilization on the ADM nodes over time. Investigation showed that the compaction on the adm_response_meta_info table was not being triggered by the ADM service, and the compaction did not remove rows that belonged to models that had been deleted. To resolve this, compaction of the adm_response_meta_info table has been moved from the ADM client nodes to the ADM service nodes, which will correctly trigger the compaction on a predefined schedule. The compaction logic has also been refactored to remove rows that belong to models that have been deleted.

INC-129212 · Issue 572541

Strategy restoration repaired

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

Once a strategy was deleted, it could not be restored afterward and a validation error appeared. This was an issue with some rule components being erroneously marked as required, and has been corrected.

INC-130761 · Issue 570061

ADMSnapshot agent defaults to running on a single node

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The ADMSnapshot agent runs when ADM is used, and should be run on only one node to prevent duplicate snapshots being created. To ensure preferred behavior, the "Run this agent on only one node at a time" option has been selected by default for ADMSnapshot agent.

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega.com is not optimized for Internet Explorer. For the optimal experience, please use:

Close Deprecation Notice
Contact us