Case Audit History shows wrong pxAddedByID
When an action is performed by the application as a background even, the "pyPerformer" column is updated with the value "System" for such audit entries, but the corresponding "pyAddedByID" column is updated with the operator ID who was working on the case.
Steps to Reproduce
Work a Smart Dispute case.
The reported behavior is expected.
Here’s the explanation for the reported behavior:
The usage of these two properties is described as:
pyPerformer: Operator ID who completed the operation recorded in this history instance.
Per these descriptions, the Operator who added the history event, and the Operator who performed the operation it references, may not always be the same.
0% found this useful